Unrest in Azad Jammu and Kashmir:The Dismissal of Ad-Hoc Government Servants

By Alisha Andleeb

Muzaffarabad :In recent developments in Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK), the Prime Minister, Chaudhry Anvar ul Haq, has ignited a wave of controversy with his decision to dismiss over 4500 ad-hoc government servants, including individuals who have dedicated over 18 years of service to their respective departments. This sweeping move encompasses more than half of the IT department, the entire Population department, and numerous employees from other vital sectors.
Despite legal challenges and a stay order issued by the high court preventing their dismissal, Chaudhry Anvar ul Haq appears steadfast in his decision, seemingly disregarding both legal directives and the years of service these individuals have contributed to public welfare.
Previously, the issue of ad-hoc employment in AJK had sparked public outcry, with the #SaveMeritInAJK hash tag trending on social media platforms. The demand echoed the sentiment of many that the governments revoke the controversial AJK Regulation of the Service of Certain Categories of Contractual, Ad-hoc or Temporary Government Employment (Terms and Conditions) Act, 2021. This act, enacted by the PMLN state government, had faced criticism for its potential to undermine job security and merit-based employment practices.
However, amidst this turmoil, another narrative has emerged. Some voices argue that the dismissal of ad-hoc employees, while harsh, is a necessary step towards reform. These individuals suggest that relying on stay orders to maintain employment has created a sense of entitlement among certain groups, leading to what they term as the “adhoc mafia.” Slogans like “adhoc mafia murda abad” are gaining traction, reflecting a growing sentiment among certain segments of the population.

The controversy surrounding Chaudhry Anvar ul Haq’s actions also intersects with political dynamics in AJK. With the looming threat of a vote of no confidence against him, some speculate that his decision may be politically motivated, aimed at implicating rival parties like the PPP and PMLN, both of which are part of his cabinet.

Amidst this complexity, Raja Farooq Haider Khan, the parliamentary leader of PMLN, has emerged as a vocal advocate for the affected individuals, standing in solidarity with them. His stance highlights the broader implications of this issue, beyond legal and political maneuvering, to the livelihoods and rights of thousands of dedicated public servants.

In conclusion, the dismissal of ad-hoc government servants in AJK has sparked a multifaceted debate, touching upon issues of legal authority, political motivations, and the rights of workers. As the situation unfolds, it remains imperative to ensure that justice is served, and the voices of those affected are heard and considered in any decision-making process.